Skip to content
Purchase Aricept 10 No Prescription Scam : Canadian Pharmacies Vytorin Without A Script : Can Somac Be Taken When Needed : Lansoprazole 60 15 Mg 49.67$ Usa : When To Take Deltasone : 500 Mg Tetracycline For Men Or Women : Avodart 60 Pills 0.5 Mg In Louisiana : Need Spironolactone 25 Mg No Pers : Purchase Amitriptyline 50 Mg Without A Rx Online : Who Has Cheapest Lasix 100 : Where Can I Purchse Tegretol 60 200 Mg In The Washington : Propecia Pharmacy Belgium : Can You Buy Prednisolone Without Being A Rx : Where Can I Just Get Hydroxyzine : Lansoprazole Online Pharmacy That Doesn't Require A Prescription : Maxalt Order No Mastercard? : Has Anyone Brought 0.5 Mg Colchicine Online Without Prescription : What Can I Use Instead Of Diclofenac 90 100 Mg 57.28$

Daily Show for more war, more soldiers?

I’m told that Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show” is one of the most popular places younger viewers get their news. More popular than late night chat shows and corporate news outlets, not that either of those shows make better choices. I watched the 2007 January 25 show with Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) to see what ideas this show brought to its viewers. I was disappointed but not surprised to learn that this show frames a pro-war stance where getting out of Iraq is quickly ruled out as something people don’t want.

This is odd to me because polls indicate strong disapproval with President George W. Bush, and the 2006 shuffling of the deck chairs in Congress was largely interpreted as Americans expressing disagreement with continuing the occupation of Iraq. This is a golden time to get mainstream press for the Out Of Iraq Now message so that it can be debated honestly and thoroughly.

Jon Stewart said that leaving Iraq immediately was outside the allowable range of debate

I think people do believe, though, that we can’t leave—just in a—like some sort of Dante’s Inferno and kind of walk away and be like ‘Wow, who started that fire!’. You know. I think most people believe that there’s something very serious to be done there.

Schumer replied that “the rational way to do it” means:

  • “stop policing a civil war; no one bargained for that”, which is shockingly stupid in itself (how dare this immoral and illegal invasion and occupation turn into something ugly!). Schumer’s point here is chiefly convenient in its admission that Iraq is in civil war. Until recently, reps of both major corporate political parties told the US to stay in Iraq to prevent civil war. According to Seymour Hersh on Democracy Now!, Iraq was in a civil war in mid-2005. No matter when it began, it all happened on our watch and our continued presence apparently makes things worse.
  • “just focus on anti-terrorism; you know, the small groups of al-Qaida”, which means we still define terrorism so that it doesn’t include our actions abroad: invasion and occupation, selling wars to the American people based on lies, and ignoring how this war fits a brutal pattern of US involvement around the world.
  • using “many fewer troops; they don’t have to be in harms way” again defies the obvious (there’s a safe place for an occupying force to reside in a country they made hostile to their presence?) and reaffirms that we’ll continue occupying Iraq.

The Out Of Iraq Now message based on the immorality of war goes unrepresented on either side of this discussion, much like what one finds in corporate “news”. Apparently, it’s still too radical to criticize continuing to do what we shouldn’t have done in the first place and were warned against before the invasion began.

I have little reason to believe that Americans will stop the Iran war before it begins.

How Corporate Media Fights Criticism: Spocko and KSFO

Blogger “Spocko” recorded and cited instances where Disney-owned Just say no to Disney KSFO-AM radio hosts Brian Sussman, Melanie Morgan, and Tom Brenner called for tortures and killings, used racist language, and aired speech against KSFO advertisers. Visa pulled their ads due to Spocko’s involvement and now apparently Disney fears that more advertisers will pull their ads too. Disney has threatened to sue Spocko for copyright infringement. Disney pulled Spocko’s blog offline for a while, but it has returned. Some of the audio clips, however, are not available on his blog. I’ve rescued the clips I could find so you could hear them for yourself.

While I can appreciate the tactic Spocko is using to bring change here (asking KSFO advertisers if this is what they want their brand name linked with), maintaining the image of a brand simply isn’t as important as threatening violence or death (ethically speaking or, less importantly, legally speaking). However, Spocko’s plan allows these advertisers to help with Spocko’s legal costs by contributing to the Electronic Frontier Foundation which is defending Spocko against Disney.

Daily KOS has more on this story.

Audio clips of the aforementioned KSFO hosts in Ogg Vorbis format.

British citizens: Please help fight software patents

If you’re British, please sign this UK government petition to tell the Prime Minister to make software patents clearly unenforcible before 20 February. If this petition helps you stay clear of the madness Americans have (most likely unknowingly) brought upon themselves, it’s a good thing.

Software patents are government-issued monopolies on ideas used in software development. Software patents hurt software developers in all but the largest patent holding firms (IBM holds the most patents right now) because software patents prevent us from distributing software that implements a number of popular algorithms including MP3 and (at one time) compressed GIF image files which are widely used on the World Wide Web. In order to properly implement support for MP3 you need a program which uses certain ideas that are patented. Without a license, those ideas are off-limits to many software developers—developers in countries which have software patents.

Alternatives which aren’t patent-encumbered, such as Ogg Vorbis (a functional substitute for MP3) and PNG (a functional substitute for GIF), are hard to popularize despite being technically superior. The software most people use most often don’t support these unencumbered formats well if at all.

The chief benefactors of software patents are multinational corporations which are, not coincidentally, the largest patent holders.

If England rejects software patents, British citizens will be safe from losing software patent infringement lawsuits. Anyone can get American patents, so the British citizens and corporations could get American patents and sue Americans for patent infringement. By working to stop software patents, you can help to save yourself.

I’ve mirrored a talk by Richard Stallman about the dangers of software patents (video, audio). Verbatim copying and distribution of the entire speech recording are permitted provided this notice is preserved.

Quoting the petition:

Software patents are used by convicted monopolists to threaten customers who consider using rival software. As a result, patents stifle innovation.

Patents are supposed to increase the rate of innovation by publicising how inventions work. Reading a software patent gives no useful information for creating or improving software. All patents are writen in a sufficiently cryptic language to prevent them from being of any use. Once decoded, the patents turn out to be for something so obvious that programmers find them laughable.

It is not funny because the cost of defending against nuicance lawsuites is huge.

The UK patent office grants software patents against the letter and the spirit of the law. They do this by pretending that there is a difference between software and ‘computer implemented inventions’.

Some companies waste money on ‘defensive patents’. These have no value against pure litigation companies and do not counter threats made directly to customers.

23rd Chaos Communication Congress video and audio

The 23rd Chaos Communication Congress (23C3) has ended and videos are available under the Creative Commons “Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Germany” (BY-NC-ND) license (local copy). They’ve published their videos in Ogg Vorbis+Theora and other formats as well.

One of the highlights is a talk from Prof. Lawrence Lessig of Stanford University on “Code vs. Culture” (audio+video, audio). More links to more videos as I get time.

Appeals to your sanity and your pocketbook.

Things to consider:

  • Eben Moglen’s appeal for the FSF touches on the recent Microsoft-Novell deal wherein Microsoft says they’ll license their patents to users of Novell’s SUSE GNU/Linux distribution and devices that resist our attempt to make them work for their owners.
  • The easiest time to give up Microsoft Windows Vista is before you can adopt it in the first place. Let the FSF explain why Vista will do you no favors.
  • Defective by Design would like to show you how DRM hurts your interests.

Using Glade and Python to build GUI applications, building websites

If you’re interested in writing GUI applications with Python, check out this beginner’s video guide to using Glade with Python and GTK+ (large video, small video, PDF slides, OpenDocument slides, code samples). Also interesting, a talk for beginners about doing work on websites.

The videos are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 license.

Code v2.0 is out.

Code v2.0 book coverCode v2.0 is Stanford Law Professor’s revised version of “Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace“. This revision was started (in part) on a wiki (a website anyone is allowed to edit) and Prof. Lessig took a copy of the wiki text up through December 31, 2005 then added his own edits.

The Wiki text was licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License as is this book.

Share and enjoy.

Place your bets: Will Firefox retain its gains in popularity?

This isn’t a terribly important question, but it could be interesting to ask because Firefox’s recent gains across EuropeThe Firefox logo are getting so much press. If you’ve seen any mainstream press recently, you’ve probably seen some reference to the Xiti Monitor survey which concluded that Firefox usage is on the rise in Europe—up to 23.2% from 19.4% in April. The Inquirer has a colorful map of Firefox usage in Europe.

Microsoft Internet Explorer (MSIE) is still the most popular web browser worldwide and the new MSIE version 7 has been released. Historically, people use the browser that comes with their computer and they don’t update their system software.

Where does this leave Firefox, a free software web browser (if one uninstalls the “Talkback” software that comes with it by default)?

Continue reading ›

Free software pressure creates more software freedom

Philip Langdale recently wrote about SD card readers and the Linux kernel. One of the conclusions he reaches seemed familiar to me (emphasis mine):

When it comes to hardware support, we often find ourselves confronted with statements that such-and-such a piece of hardware can’t be used to its full capability under linux or feature ‘X’ isn’t supported yet. For a long time, the SD card reader in many recent laptops fell into that category but thanks to the efforts of Pierre Ossman, who managed to reverse engineer the SDHCI standard from trial-and-error and partial documentation, many of us are now able to use that reader. Although I can’t prove it, I feel that the subsequent publishing of the ’simplified’ spec (without the DRM bits that we don’t care about) by the SD Association was provoked by his efforts (Why bother hiding it now?) Thanks to those specs, Pierre was able to polish the driver up even more and support a wider range of implementations (of course, there are some that are so out there that even having the SDHCI spec isn’t enough to get them working).

The claim reminded me of another similar example of free software pressuring non-free information to be published in such a way that it becomes useful for the free software community.

Consider the pressure of all the hackers working on free software Java implementationsThe Java logo. I’m convinced that Sun will free their Java software to stay relevant in a world where free software Java work (Apache Harmony, Kaffe, Classpath, and others) is becoming increasingly functional and available on more amenable terms than Sun’s implementation.

So of course Sun’s Simon Phipps is a big fan of GPLv3 so farGPLv3 is the upcoming version of the GNU General Public License—from how things look so far, GPLv3 will help keep Java free in such a way that improvements to Sun’s Java software will pose no threat to Sun. Sure, the license change will simultaneously make the free software community happy (which will turn the community into advocating for the use of Java instead of seeing Java as a trap), but it wasn’t long ago that James Gosling at Sun defended the status quo by claiming any opposition to Sun’s extant licensing was unclear (“It’s often difficult to get a good picture from the open source community of what they actually object to in what we’re doing”). Gosling is also quoted there saying that Sun’s Java customers would object to an “open source” Java:

We’ve got several thousand man-years of engineering in [Java], and we hear very strongly that if this thing turned into an open source project—where just any old person could check in stuff—they’d all freak. They’d all go screaming into the hills.

and Gosling was described as being ambivalent about Apache Harmony.

Nobody died when Clinton lied?

While having sex with Monica Lewinsky (and lying about it) didn’t directly cause anyone to die, former US President William Jefferson Clinton’s policies certainly condemned a lot of people to death as William Blum points out.