<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton and Edwards get their wish: &#8220;a more serious … smaller group&#8221; of candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/</link>
	<description>Free Software movement news and related interests.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.B. Nicholson-Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>J.B. Nicholson-Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve heard of him and support some of what he stands for.  I&#039;m remiss in not mentioning his name, so I&#039;ll point out that he recently wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-mike-gravel/dennis-kucinichs-brave-v_b_83609.html?view=print&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a very nice article&lt;/a&gt; in which he says (among other things) that he&#039;ll remain in the race.  It&#039;s a shame you don&#039;t post with your real name and email address so people can contact you and discuss Gravel&#039;s stance on the issues of the day.  Gravel spoke out (in the few opportunities afforded him by the corporate media &quot;debates&quot;) against the invasion and occupation of Iraq.  Paying for universal health care with a sales tax, as Gravel proposes, strikes me initially as not a good idea because I don&#039;t think poor people should pay the same rate as the rich.  I&#039;d prefer a means of taxation that charges those who have more to pay more.  I&#039;m also not convinced that allowing private health care to compete with the public health care will end up with a public health care that isn&#039;t quickly whittled away after being underfunded and then pointed to as &#039;inadequate&#039;.  However clearly any health care plan that covers everyone in the country without tying health care to work is a huge step in the right direction, a step the more popular candidates aren&#039;t willing to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve heard of him and support some of what he stands for.  I&#8217;m remiss in not mentioning his name, so I&#8217;ll point out that he recently wrote <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-mike-gravel/dennis-kucinichs-brave-v_b_83609.html?view=print" rel="nofollow">a very nice article</a> in which he says (among other things) that he&#8217;ll remain in the race.  It&#8217;s a shame you don&#8217;t post with your real name and email address so people can contact you and discuss Gravel&#8217;s stance on the issues of the day.  Gravel spoke out (in the few opportunities afforded him by the corporate media &#8220;debates&#8221;) against the invasion and occupation of Iraq.  Paying for universal health care with a sales tax, as Gravel proposes, strikes me initially as not a good idea because I don&#8217;t think poor people should pay the same rate as the rich.  I&#8217;d prefer a means of taxation that charges those who have more to pay more.  I&#8217;m also not convinced that allowing private health care to compete with the public health care will end up with a public health care that isn&#8217;t quickly whittled away after being underfunded and then pointed to as &#8216;inadequate&#8217;.  However clearly any health care plan that covers everyone in the country without tying health care to work is a huge step in the right direction, a step the more popular candidates aren&#8217;t willing to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wack</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Wack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcitizen.info/2008/01/25/clinton-and-edwards-get-their-wish-a-more-serious-%e2%80%a6-smaller-group-of-candidates/#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Ever heard of Mike Gravel? He&#039;s still running... He&#039;s brilliant... He&#039;s completely censored from the Mass media... You can find him on youtube and... that&#039;s about it.

If articles like this one don&#039;t even mention his name, it&#039;s pretty sad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of Mike Gravel? He&#8217;s still running&#8230; He&#8217;s brilliant&#8230; He&#8217;s completely censored from the Mass media&#8230; You can find him on youtube and&#8230; that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>If articles like this one don&#8217;t even mention his name, it&#8217;s pretty sad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

