November 2004

US 2004 Election conclusions.

  1. Bush will remain president.
  2. The Democrats won’t have a Nader scapegoat (which they didn’t have in 2000, but don’t tell a Democrat that), they’ll have to face the fact that their candidate lost all on his own.
  3. Kerry was a weak and stiff candidate—like Gore was in 2000 and Dole was before Gore.
  4. Right now, Hillary Clinton is planning to run in 2008. So is Jeb Bush. Clinton will lose to the Bush juggernaut because Democrats aren’t progressive enough to vote for a woman and because Democrats aren’t progressive enough to challenge their federal party to lose their corporate campaign funding.
  5. Dan Rather will continue to say wacky offensive pseudo-folksy shit (from 2000: the close race was like “two babes in bikinis running to the beachhouse … It’s going to be hot and tight.”).
  6. The US is far more conservative than the Left wants to admit. The Left doesn’t have as many supporters as the Left wants to claim. The Right is more powerful because their messages are more easily understood and more popular with an increasingly stupid country: 11 out of 11 states OK gay marriage bans, Bush gets a popular vote mandate (millions more than the US participants in the biggest single march against the invasion of Iraq), the American South wants Republicans more than Democrats.

Politicos

Comments Off

Permalink

At least 100,000 Iraqi dead

According to an interview with Les Roberts on Democracy Now!:

  • The Pentagon may be collecting civilian death figures and keeping them secret.
  • A survey concluded that there is at least 100,000 Iraqi dead.

This is, of course, appalling but not surprising. And it still doesn’t come close to the estimate Secretary Albright gave of the deaths caused by Clinton’s continuation of the sanctions against Iraq. There, half a million Iraqi were said to be dead.

And if you choose Republican vs. Democrat, you get to say how many more should die because neither major party candidate wants to pull out (”can’t cut and run”). How many fewer Vietnamese dead would there be if people had pushed the pull out agenda sooner? It’s not a question of when the right time to pull out is, it’s a question of how quickly can people mobilize to prevent the war from starting in the first place and if that cause loses, how quickly can the public call for pull out.

Politicos

Comments Off

Permalink